| |
Reverse Exchanges
Exchanging taxpayers may be unable to sell
relinquished property prior to acquiring replacement property or
may have specific reasons to acquire replacement property prior
to the sale of the relinquished property. It may additionally be
the desire of an exchanger to construct improvements on a
property prior to its acquisition. For these circumstances, the
I.R.S. created a "safe harbor" with Rev. Proc. 2000-37
authorizing the execution of "reverse" and "improvement"
exchanges.
Under this I.R.S. safe-harbor, exchangers are prohibited from
taking actual title to the replacement property, prior to the
sale of relinquished property. As a result, an "Exchange
Accommodation Titleholder" (EAT) must step in the shoes of the
exchanger. Careful attention must be paid by the exchanger to
ensure that proper arrangements have been made prior to the
sale. As with a delayed exchange, specific restrictions and time
limitations must be followed, including the requirement of a
qualified intermediary to facilitate the exchange between the
respective property owners and the EAT.
Fees for reverse, build-to-suit and improvement exchanges are
substantially greater than for delayed exchanges due to the fact
that I.R.S. rules require that the EAT actually own the "parked"
property. Certain transactional costs are inherent to the
transaction and include transfer taxes, recording fees, mortgage
taxes, lender charges, escrow and title fees, legal and
accounting fees, insurance fees, and the costs of creating a
special purpose entity (SPE) to hold the parked property. Fees
charged by IPE 1031 will be negotiated and are based
upon the level of complexity of a transaction.
Reverse and improvement exchanges involve complex considerations
and require extensive advanced planning. As a result, exchangers
contemplating this course of action must provide IPE 1031 with
substantial lead time to structure the exchange.

|
|